[Recording] Kinologists: Results 2015, beginning of 2016. How do you like the format?

Max Solodilov and I have for several months have been making plans for creating our own movie show, where they could have pleaded plenty of about what we found on the Internet, what was going on the cinema and what was going on through festivals.

But at some (as always, the last) moment they decided that it was inappropriate to make a full-fledged podcast: it is much better and easier to conduct a special movie on twice, and then lay out the record.

The first sample turned out the way it turned out. We did not have a clear structure and prepared by topics (except for the banal “Best-fute films of the year”), there was no time to adequately read the comments of the audience (I wanted to say too much). In general, look.

And now, when you looked, express yourself: how do you like this format? Maybe we are a little stubbornly, and make a truly intelligible radio with a list of topics and a predetermined chronometrae from this? Or vice versa, score and just answer the questions: “And you watched the movie N?».

It will not be possible to listen to each opinion, but we will read everyone carefully.
Thanks for!

The best comments

Easily.
If you discuss not old films, as this time, but new ones, then it really makes sense to give a good, deep critical analysis.
Plus we look a lot from old or unknown, you can also tell.
Plus answers to questions.
Plus, if the week in the premieres and news is deaf, you can find an infinite number of topics like: “horrors”, “Australian cinema”, “operator work”, “old and silent cinema” and so on.
While I think about the number «Two weeks». Total 25 issues per year.
Yes, lagging!

As a sofa expert, I can say that the format is very successful and is a kind of outlet from simple gamesters. I would like to see this more. The stories and interesting facts about the cinema are especially pleased, I learn a lot of new things.

So we are waiting for 🙂

As for me, you better sketch a certain number of topics, discuss them, and then go to answers to the questions of visitors to the site that will ask them on the blogs on time.

It was fun, but the palm was stuck in the forehead on the story of Powers, flying at the American Jpio Japio Japio)

I liked this format of streams. If you make https://bingositesnotongamstop.co.uk/review/seven-casino/ it monthly and build a certain plan about which films you will talk about, you will get a fairly good program)

He will bother you 🙂
I think the questions “And you watched the movie N?»You can take a separate stream or a separate time or respond to it if this film corresponds to the topic of stream.
The main thing is that you yourself would be a pleasure (yes, it is obvious that if you didn’t like it, then you would not offer, but still) and everything will be perceived with a bang.

A good broadcast came out. I listened to you on the road and did not even notice how I already arrived. Thank you.

Well, about the format. You can do it, first discuss the topics you planned, and then answer questions. At the same time, the most interesting questions or comments outside the plan to put on the air. You can also try to invite spectators who will ask questions directly on the air and discuss them. The choice is yours.

Oh yes. It is better not to play games on the air so as not to be distracted from the conversation. Otherwise the malt was always losing concentration.

I really liked the format, at least you saw podcasts. It seems to me that in this case this option is even more suitable so that no one is distracted by the games and it turns out somewhere an hour-after-hour record with concentrated interesting things.

And on the background you can launch Mountain, a Jew’s simulator, one of the last games from Telltale or something in the Zero Player Games genre

In my opinion, it is easier to release a stream once a month, and a buoy with it, with a script. But the podcast would also be cool to listen.
In general, both ideas are good, I don’t know what to choose. Although you can probably carry out some kind of Oscar streams, and cut the podcasts in the rest of the months.

Well, it means until March, at least you can not wait for discussions of Australian cinema. And in the planned January issue, there will be mainly conversations on the results of the globe or also Sandance?

It became interesting to me, this movie show is planned to be done on a regular basis or from case to case, or they will even score it after the third issue? Just if you do it regularly, if there is enough at least for an hour -long stream (unless of course you do not leave the topic of cinema at all)?

You got a suitable radio. I do not watch a movie very much, but I am always glad to listen to objective criticism.

If you still decide to hold such a show, then:

– In a few days (week), indicate the approximate topic of the show (if it is) and the list of films that you will discuss. This will be a warning about spoilers, so in the show you will be free in statements. This will also allow those who wish to get acquainted with the topic and write their questions in the post.

– after the show, lay out the materials used (articles, rollers, etc.p.) that used. It will be very convenient for us.

-You can introduce a mini-robe “Kelebro makes garbage”, where you will talk about shit, which is worth looking at because it is shit. If I remember correctly, then you love like that, right?

– Do not get tied to the timing. Speak while there is a topic and corresponding material. The main thing is not to go to the sky-high ones in the region of 5-6 hours.

– against the background, include either in self -playing or battles of bots in MK. Either call the third person who will play exactly (guest from the audience))).

And, well, and here is a case similar to the story from «Room». They even shot a film on it – «The mockingbird will not sing».

This is rather a personal wish than public, but still.
You often talk about the rhythm of the film, about building the plot, about working with light and other things that are usually unknown to the viewer. I understand that such inserts are the “gold coins” of the show, but you could not advise materials on these topics? So that we, too, can go beyond the boundaries «I just like this movie».

A quite good idea, especially in Rashka, where only reviews of Russian comedies are widespread on the topics of films.